Yes, absolutely. Many cities around the world have installed street benches that are specifically engineered to prevent skateboarders from grinding or sliding along their edges. This type of "hostile architecture" or "defensive design" aims to balance public comfort with property protection, though it often sparks debates about inclusivity.
Common anti-skateboarding features include:
1. Metal or stone inserts along the bench edge – Instead of smooth concrete or wood, the grinding surface is replaced with rough, textured metal or stone that damages skateboard wheels.
2. Separate armrests or dividers – Placing armrests in the middle of the bench (instead of only at ends) breaks the continuous ledge needed for grinding.
3. Angled or sloped seating surfaces – Benches with a slight backward tilt or uneven surfaces make it nearly impossible to maintain balance while grinding.
4. Shortened or segmented bench lengths – A bench that is split into sections (e.g., two separate seats with a gap) eliminates the long straight edge grinders rely on.
5. Raised bumpers or studs – Small metal or plastic studs protruding from the bench’s side create an uncomfortable, bumpy path for skateboard wheels.
For example, the so-called "Camden Bench" in London incorporates a curved, sloped top and a central metal spine, making it both uncomfortable to sit on for long periods and impossible to grind. Similarly, in many public parks, you’ll see benches with steel plates bolted onto the front edge—a clear anti-skateboarding tactic.
However, these designs have faced criticism for being exclusionary, especially toward homeless individuals who may rely on benches for rest. Critics argue that cities should instead invest in skateparks and community dialogue rather than punitive furniture. So while these benches do exist, their use is a balancing act between skateboarding culture, public safety, and urban accessibility.