That's an excellent question, and it gets right to the heart of what makes public spaces welcoming. The short answer is yes, absolutely—the seats on urban benches can and often should be made wider for added comfort. But this simple change involves more consideration than one might think.
Traditionally, many city benches are designed with a focus on durability, cost, and deterring overnight sleeping, often resulting in narrow, hard, and segmented seats. A shift towards wider seating, however, aligns with a growing "people-first" approach to urban design. A wider seat allows for more natural posture, room to shift position, and space for personal items. It significantly improves the experience for a broader range of body types, making public spaces more inclusive.
The benefits extend beyond individual comfort. Wider benches are inherently more social. They invite conversation between strangers, accommodate families or small groups wanting to sit together, and provide a more pleasant spot for people to rest, read, or simply observe city life. This fosters a stronger sense of community and encourages longer, more frequent use of public areas.
Of course, practical challenges exist. Wider benches require more material and space, impacting upfront costs and the layout of sidewalks and plazas. Maintenance and anchoring considerations are also factors. Yet, the long-term value—enhanced public well-being, increased foot traffic for local businesses, and a more livable city—often outweighs these initial hurdles. Innovative designs are emerging, such as benches with varied widths along their span or modular units that can be configured as needed.
Ultimately, asking for wider benches is about advocating for public spaces that prioritize human comfort and connection. It's a tangible step towards creating cities that are not just efficient, but truly enjoyable and accessible for everyone.