That’s a fair question, and it deserves a straight answer. Yes, some of our urban benches are designed with armrest dividers, and one of the practical effects is that they discourage people from lying down or sleeping across the full length of the bench. But the design intent is broader than that.
In busy streets, transit stops, and plazas, a long uninterrupted bench often gets used by one person lying down, which can make it difficult for others to sit. Armrest dividers help keep seating available for more people. They also provide support for older adults or people with mobility issues when sitting down and standing up. Visually, dividers break a long bench into clear personal spaces, which many people prefer.
We are aware that this type of design is sometimes called hostile architecture, and we take that criticism seriously. We do not use spikes, aggressive slopes, or deliberately uncomfortable materials. Our goal is not to punish people who have nowhere else to rest. At the same time, city benches are public furniture: they need to serve many different users throughout the day, and they have to be durable, easy to maintain, and safe.
Not every bench we make has armrest dividers. In parks, waterfronts, and quieter areas, we often use open benches without dividers. In high-traffic urban locations, a divided bench is usually the more responsible choice because it keeps seating accessible and prevents one person from monopolizing the space. It also reduces some maintenance problems, such as litter accumulation and wear concentrated in one spot.
So, are the dividers meant to stop people from sleeping? Honestly, that is part of the function in certain settings, but it’s not the only reason. A well-designed urban bench balances comfort, access, durability, and the reality of shared public space. We try to make choices that are practical without being cruel.